California Partnership Agreement: CRUPA, LLP Registration, FTB Tax
Updated May 2026. California partnerships operate under the California Revised Uniform Partnership Act (CRUPA), Cal. Corp. Code §§16100-16962. The drafting differs from generic templates in three areas that matter: non-compete enforceability, fiduciary-duty waiver limits, and the Franchise Tax Board’s entity-level tax regime. This page covers each. General legal information, not legal advice.
General information, not legal advice. California partnership law and tax interact closely; FTB rules in particular are detailed and changing.
The California Entity Choice
California permits four partnership-type entities:
| Entity | Statute | GP liability | Annual minimum tax |
|---|---|---|---|
| General partnership (GP) | Cal. Corp. Code §§16100-16962 (CRUPA) | Unlimited personal | None (only income tax filing) |
| Limited partnership (LP) | Cal. Corp. Code §§15900-15912.07 (CRULPA) | Unlimited personal (workaround: LLC GP) | $800 annual minimum tax |
| LLP (limited liability partnership) | Cal. Corp. Code §§16951-16962 | Limited (professional services only) | $800 annual minimum tax |
| LLLP | NOT recognised in California | N/A | N/A |
For most California businesses, the practical answer is an LLC (not on this table), which gives all members limited liability and pass-through taxation. The LLC also pays the $800 annual minimum tax plus a tiered gross-receipts fee that can reach $11,790 for businesses with over $5M in California revenue. For professional services firms required to use a partnership form (law, accounting, architecture), the LLP is the right answer.
The California-Specific Drafting Points
1. Non-compete void in most contexts
A California partnership agreement cannot include an enforceable post-departure non-compete unless the restriction is tied to the sale of a partner’s interest under Bus. & Prof. Code §16601. Standard partnership templates from non-California sources almost always include broader non-compete language that is void in California. The agreement should either omit the post-departure non-compete entirely or scope it specifically to the §16601 sale-of-interest exception.
Non-solicitation of customers (to the limited extent necessary to protect trade secrets) and non-solicitation of employees are generally enforceable. The agreement should rely on non-solicitation rather than non-compete for ongoing operational protection. Confidentiality and trade-secret provisions remain fully enforceable and are the primary mechanism for protecting the partnership’s information assets.
2. Fiduciary-duty waivers limited
Cal. Corp. Code §16103 permits the partnership agreement to modify or limit certain aspects of the duty of loyalty and the duty of care, but the modifications must not be “manifestly unreasonable.” The statute specifically prohibits eliminating the duty of loyalty altogether or eliminating the obligation of good faith and fair dealing. Unlike Delaware (which permits broad waivers in partnership agreements under DRULPA §17-1101), California courts may scrutinise broad fiduciary-duty waivers and refuse to enforce them.
Practical implication: standard California partnership agreements should specifically identify the types of conduct that are pre-authorised (e.g. customary related-party transactions on arm’s-length terms, taking advantage of unrelated business opportunities) rather than including a sweeping waiver of fiduciary duties. The narrower drafting is more likely to be enforced.
3. Annual minimum franchise tax planning
LPs and LLPs in California (but not GPs) owe the $800 annual minimum franchise tax under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §17935 and §17948.2 respectively. The 2020 AB 85 amendment exempts these entities from the minimum tax for their first taxable year if formed on or after 1 January 2021 and before 1 January 2024 (the exemption has been extended at various times; verify current status with the FTB).
For partnerships in their second year and beyond, the $800 is owed regardless of income. Form 565 (or Form 568 for LLCs) reports the tax. The minimum tax is in addition to any income flowing through to the partners; the partners owe California personal income tax on their distributive shares as well.
The agreement should specifically authorise the partnership to make timely tax filings and to retain or distribute funds sufficient to cover the minimum tax. Defaulting on the minimum tax can result in suspension of the partnership’s ability to do business in California.
The LLP Registration Process (Professional Services Only)
California LLPs are available only for partnerships that practise law, public accountancy, architecture, engineering, or land surveying. Other professional services and general business partnerships cannot form California LLPs (this is unusual; most states permit any partnership to register as an LLP).
The registration process for a California LLP:
- File Form LLP-1, Application to Register Limited Liability Partnership, with the Secretary of State;
- Filing fee: $70 (verify current fee);
- Maintain professional liability insurance: minimum $100,000 per claim for law firms; $1M aggregate for accounting firms; varies for other professions (per Cal. Corp. Code §16956);
- Pay the annual $800 minimum franchise tax via Form 565;
- File annual Statement of Information (Form LLP-12) every two years; $25 filing fee.
Once registered, partners in the LLP are not personally liable for the negligence or malpractice of other partners or partnership employees (Cal. Corp. Code §16306). Each partner remains personally liable for their own malpractice and for ordinary contractual obligations they personally incur.
Sample California-Specific Partnership Provisions
Local Taxes Worth Knowing About
California partnerships with operations in major cities face local business taxes that meaningfully affect modelling:
- San Francisco Gross Receipts Tax. Up to ~1% of San Francisco-source gross receipts (rates vary by business activity). Combined with the Homelessness Gross Receipts Tax and the Overpaid Executive Tax, the total can exceed 1.5% for some businesses. Imposed quarterly with annual reconciliation on the Business Personal Property Statement.
- Los Angeles Business License Tax. Up to ~0.5% of LA-source gross receipts, varying by business classification. Annual filing.
- San Jose Business Tax. Tiered annual fees based on employee count and revenue.
- Property tax. If the partnership owns real estate, Prop. 13 limits annual increases but reassessment triggers on change of control (which can include partnership interest transfers exceeding 50% over time).
Multi-city operations require multi-city compliance. The agreement should authorise the managing partner to register the partnership for local taxes in each city where the partnership does business and to pay the resulting taxes from partnership funds.
Authoritative Sources
- Cal. Corp. Code §§16100-16962 (California Revised Uniform Partnership Act). California Legislative Information.
- Cal. Corp. Code §§15900-15912.07 (California Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act).
- Cal. Corp. Code §§16951-16962 (California LLP statutes).
- Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§16600-16602.5 (non-compete prohibitions and exceptions).
- Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §17935 and §17948.2 (LP and LLP annual tax).
- California Franchise Tax Board, Form 565 instructions. FTB.
- City and County of San Francisco Business and Tax Regulations Code Art. 12-A-1.
- California Secretary of State Business Programs Division. CA SOS.
FAQ
Does California recognise general partnerships?
Yes. California adopted the California Revised Uniform Partnership Act (CRUPA) effective 1 January 1997, codified at Cal. Corp. Code §§16100-16962. CRUPA closely follows the 1997 revision of the Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA). General partnerships in California form by default when two or more persons co-own a business for profit, with or without a written agreement. There is no required state filing for a general partnership; the partnership is recognised by operation of law.
Does California allow LLLPs?
No. California has not enacted LLLP-enabling legislation. California limited partnerships (LPs) operate under Cal. Corp. Code §§15900-15912.07 (the California Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act of 2008) and provide limited liability for limited partners but not for general partners. To shield the general partner from personal liability in California, the standard workaround is to interpose an LLC or corporate general partner. California does recognise LLPs (limited liability partnerships) for use by professional services firms (law, accounting, architecture, and a few others), formed under Cal. Corp. Code §§16951-16962.
Do California partnerships file Form 565?
Yes. California partnerships file Form 565 (California Return of Partnership Income) annually with the California Franchise Tax Board. The return is similar to federal Form 1065 but with California-specific adjustments. California partnerships are also subject to the annual $800 minimum franchise tax (with a one-year exemption for partnerships in their first year of business under AB 85 (2020)). LPs and LLPs are subject to this annual minimum tax; general partnerships are not (general partnerships have no California entity-level annual fee, just the income tax filing requirement).
Are non-compete clauses enforceable in California partnerships?
Only in connection with the sale of a partnership interest. California Bus. & Prof. Code §16600 voids virtually all post-departure non-compete clauses, with §16601 providing the narrow exception for sale of a business or partnership interest. The 2024 amendment (Bus. & Prof. Code §16600.5) imposes notice obligations on employers with unenforceable non-competes in employee contracts. For partnership drafting purposes, non-competes operative on buyout or sale are enforceable within reasonable limits; non-competes operative on simple departure are void.
What fiduciary duties do California partners owe?
Cal. Corp. Code §16404 sets out the duties of loyalty and care, mirroring RUPA §404. The duties include accounting to the partnership for profits, refraining from self-dealing with the partnership without consent, and refraining from competing with the partnership. California courts apply these duties strictly, drawing on the strong fiduciary tradition exemplified by Page v. Page (1961) and progeny. Unlike Delaware, California does not permit broad waiver of fiduciary duties by agreement; Cal. Corp. Code §16103 permits the agreement to identify specific activities that do not violate the duty of loyalty if not manifestly unreasonable, but does not allow blanket waivers.
California Partnership Drafting Needs Local Counsel
California rules differ enough from generic templates that local-counsel review is worth the spend.